诉讼时效的经典案例-法律综合法律援助-法律咨询免费平台-国际律师联盟

网站首页词典首页

问题	诉讼时效的经典案例
释义	律师分析: 民事诉讼时效是指权利人经过法定期限不行使自己的权利，依法律规定其胜诉权便归于消灭的制度。一般权利人向人民法院请求保护民事权利的诉讼时效期间为三年。法律另有规定的，依照其规定。【法律依据】: 《中华人民共和国民法典》第一百八十八条向人民法院请求保护民事权利的诉讼时效期间为三年。法律另有规定的，依照其规定。
随便看	北京大学在哪里北京大学在哪里北京肺炎球菌疫苗什么时候打北京肺炎球菌疫苗什么时候打？北京肺炎球菌疫苗什么时候打开羽毛球馆需要办营业执照吗北京领证去哪个区都可以吗开羽毛球馆需要办营业执照吗？开羽毛球馆需要办营业执照吗北京领证去哪个区都可以吗开羽毛球馆需要办营业执照嘛？怎么投诉羽毛球馆工作人员？开羽毛球馆需要办营业执照吗？开羽毛球馆需要办营业执照吗 ? 体育馆羽毛球卡不退费开羽毛球馆需要办营业执照吗北京领证去哪个区都可以吗两个在北京读大学的大学生户口都在学校集体户，可以在北京领结婚证吗? 开羽毛球馆需要办营业执照吗北体大体育生录取分数线2021 开车去北京大兴国际机场用办理进京证吗？停车方便吗？在北京的大学上学可以落户北京吗在北京上大学可以落户北京吗北京公园年票常年办理地点北京看升旗几点去排队 controversy over the right to assign a patent controversy over the right to broadcast a work controversy over the right to duplicate a work controversy over the right to eliminate harassment from neighboring real property controversy over the right to exhibit a work controversy over the right to get married controversy over the right to licensed use of a patent controversy over the right to publish a work controversy over the right to put a work to fixation controversy over the right to shoot films over a work controversy over the right to stage a work controversy over the right to the undersigning of patent inventor controversy over the right to the use of a chain of mountains controversy over the right to the use of barren hills controversy over the right to the use of forest controversy over the right to the use of land controversy over the right to the use of mudflat controversy over the right to the use of wasteland controversy over the right to translate a work controversy over the right to use patent marks controversy over tortious damage controversy over transfer of technology contract controversy over undertaking of construction projects controversy over warehousing contract controversy over water resources

法律咨询免费平台收录17839362条法律咨询问答词条，基本涵盖了全部常用法律问题的释义及解答，是法律学习及实务的有利工具。